The Indian team showed fleeting glimpses of the greatness but England was overall the better team in the first test match of the series. There was a lot of hype surrounding this test match considering this is the 2000th test match ever and Sachin was expected to score the magical 100th Century at thie grand venue. Another interesting stat that I did not know was that between Dravid, Sachin and Laxman; they had scored 99 test centuries before this match. So we were all looking forward to a great absorbing duel.
Instead, India went on the backfoot almost immediately after winning the toss. Zaheer bowled with some fire and guile and managed to consume couple of top order wickets. Thereafter he pulled his hamstring and went out of the game (and the next one). That reduced the bowling options considerably for MSD, although Pravin Kumar admirably rose to the occasion. Ishanth and Bhajji were off colour and did not adjust well. At one stage, MSD gave the keeper’s gloves to Dravid and bowled a few overs, possibly to cut the over rate. Kevin Pietersen batted beautifully to score a double hundred and put India under a lot of pressure with some great support from Trott. India, chasing 474, barely managed to avoid follow on. Dravid scored a good solid 100 and proved his value as a great test match batsman.
In the second innings, India seemed to have created an opening for themselves when they had England down at 5-62 and 6-102. But then Prior came and played a typical No. 7 wicket-keeper knock to put the game beyond the Indians. To top it all, Gautam Gambhir got hit and was not able to bat in the second innings. The Indian team resembled a army infirmary with a few players nursing some injury. The reduced and modified batting line up could not stop the Englishmen from completing a well earned victory. Hats off to Dravid again who came to open the batting in the second innings.
The positives for England, were KP and Trott’s batting. The bowling of Anderson and Broad. For the Indians, the only shining line was the batting of Dravid and some good spells from PK. Bhajji needs to start contributing as a bowler and the rest of the batting unit needs to come to the party to make a statement. Otherwise the number one spot is at risk.
Nasser Hussain made a comment in his post match analysis that the Indian team does not value the Number one ranking very much and I tend to agree with me. I did not see any heroics from the batters to save the test match. He also mentioned that the IPL takes a lot out of the players and we are seeing some after effects of that in the current series.
Indian team needs to go back to the drawing board and look at the limited options they have and come back to fight this out.
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Monday, July 18, 2011
Battle Royal : Curtain Raiser
India arrived in England after a successful campaign in West Indies, where I thought they should have done better than just winning the series 1-0. We at least deserved a 2-0 score line. But that is a different discussion and frankly with the second string team visiting WI, I really did not pay much attention to the series. I think the boards ought to put some conditions in the contracts which will force the countries to send their best teams on tour.
Coming back to England, I think the two teams playing in English conditions are pretty evenly matched. The English team is very balanced and almost copies the famous Australian team composition; five batters, a wicket-keeper who comes and scores fast, a spinner and four fast bowlers. Their batting lineup is very daunting with Cook, Trott and Bell in sublime form. Add Strauss, KP and Prior to that trio and you can expect some mauling of the bowling attack. Indian team is back to full strength and the selectors have done a good job with the team given that Kohli and Badrinath wasted their opportunities in the Caribbean. The famous batting lineup is in full strength although there are some doubts about Sehwag’s participation in the first two games. The bowling relies heavily on Zaheer and Harbhajan, but here is where the new gen has its opportunities. Ishant did well in the Caribbean and should be effective in England too. Munaf and Ashwin can be good back up options. Bhajji needs to start taking wickets again. So there is an even contest on the cards.
My prediction for this series is India winning with a margin of 1 test. Either a 1-0 or 2-1 result in favour of India.
Coming back to England, I think the two teams playing in English conditions are pretty evenly matched. The English team is very balanced and almost copies the famous Australian team composition; five batters, a wicket-keeper who comes and scores fast, a spinner and four fast bowlers. Their batting lineup is very daunting with Cook, Trott and Bell in sublime form. Add Strauss, KP and Prior to that trio and you can expect some mauling of the bowling attack. Indian team is back to full strength and the selectors have done a good job with the team given that Kohli and Badrinath wasted their opportunities in the Caribbean. The famous batting lineup is in full strength although there are some doubts about Sehwag’s participation in the first two games. The bowling relies heavily on Zaheer and Harbhajan, but here is where the new gen has its opportunities. Ishant did well in the Caribbean and should be effective in England too. Munaf and Ashwin can be good back up options. Bhajji needs to start taking wickets again. So there is an even contest on the cards.
My prediction for this series is India winning with a margin of 1 test. Either a 1-0 or 2-1 result in favour of India.
Sunday, April 03, 2011
India wins World Cup again!!
A nation of 1.2 billion people erupted in one of the longest celebration parties in recent time when M.S. Dhoni whacked that ball into stratosphere for the match winning six. I remember watching the 1983 finals on a black and white TV set when Kapil Dev’s team won the cup for the first time. That team was not expected to go the distance then. This time around though, the expectations were quite different. We would not have settled for anything less than the championship. And boy did the team play well! The last three games were a dream run. First Australians were demolished, then Pakistan was banished in Mohali and finally the Sri Lankans were blown away in Mumbai. It was a superlative effort and the team deserves all the praise and accolades that it will receive in the coming days.
Well done team India and congratulations!!
Saturday, January 08, 2011
The Ashes 2010 – Test 5: Total Annihilation
Never in the recent past has the Australian team got such a drubbing at home. In the final test at Sydney they seemed to be mesmerized with no clue about what was happening around them. England on the other hand came prepared and were ready for the kill. They ensured that the ashes were won convincingly and left no doubt as to the better team.
There was a lot of talk about the change in guard and a fightback from the wounded Aussies before the test match began. I think the Australian team still thinks that there is nothing wrong with them. That is reflected in their team selection and also in their approach. The only changes they made this time were sort of forced changes. Khawaja came in place of injured Ponting and Beer came in as a specialist spinner. The team still thought that the firm of Johnson, Hilfenhaus and Siddle were capable of running through the opposition. That was wishful thinking and England demonstrated that this attack is toothless in the only innings they batted. Only Shane Watson and Steve Smith seemed to create any opportunities in that innings. Cook continued his brilliant form and was helped by centuries from Bell and Prior.
The approach of the team and its belief in its own abilities is also key in a test match. After getting bowled out for 281, thanks to a rearguard action from Mitchell Johnson who was the only person to post a fifty; the Aussies had the Poms at 5/226 when Collingwood got out. At that stage they should have enforced a quick closure. But they allowed Prior and Bell to score freely and take the score to a mammoth 644 runs. Then in their second innings, when the situation called for playing out the time, they went on the attack and lost the plot. The English bowling was too good for them and they lost by an innings. So in this series they lost all the three matches by over an innings, they conceded 500+ runs three times.
As far as Australia are concerned there were no positives from this series. It thoroughly exposed their bowling limitations. It also exposed the lack in depth of their batting pipeline and therefore it looks like a very steep climb from here on. Barring Perth, their bowlers never took 20 wickets in a test match. All the commentators were in unison on this. As Ian Chapell said a band aid solution ain’t going to fix it. They need a complete overhaul of the selection committee, the coaching staff and the team. The irony will be if they win the series at home against SL in August they will start day dreaming again. Ricky Ponting is done as a skipper, it remains to be seen if he stays as a batsman.
England on the other hand have a bagful of positives. The batting of Cook, Strauss, Trott, Pietersen, Prior and Bell. The bowling of Anderson, Swann, Finn, Tremlett and Bresnan and the fielding overall has been stellar. The only negative, if you really have to pick any, would be the form of Collingwood (who has announced his retirement now) and to an extent the inability of Pietersen to focus on the job and play a long innings consistently. I thought a lot of credit must go to their coach and the back room team. Their bowlers were spot on from the first delivery and bowled very few no balls. They created opportunities and applied pressure when required.
On the whole, I think England deservedly won the series 3-1. My prediction was a English with a margin of 1 (2-1 being my favored score line). But hey, who is complaining when you witness some great cricket and a total annihilation of the Aussies. Watch out for my statistical analysis of the series to wrap this series.
There was a lot of talk about the change in guard and a fightback from the wounded Aussies before the test match began. I think the Australian team still thinks that there is nothing wrong with them. That is reflected in their team selection and also in their approach. The only changes they made this time were sort of forced changes. Khawaja came in place of injured Ponting and Beer came in as a specialist spinner. The team still thought that the firm of Johnson, Hilfenhaus and Siddle were capable of running through the opposition. That was wishful thinking and England demonstrated that this attack is toothless in the only innings they batted. Only Shane Watson and Steve Smith seemed to create any opportunities in that innings. Cook continued his brilliant form and was helped by centuries from Bell and Prior.
The approach of the team and its belief in its own abilities is also key in a test match. After getting bowled out for 281, thanks to a rearguard action from Mitchell Johnson who was the only person to post a fifty; the Aussies had the Poms at 5/226 when Collingwood got out. At that stage they should have enforced a quick closure. But they allowed Prior and Bell to score freely and take the score to a mammoth 644 runs. Then in their second innings, when the situation called for playing out the time, they went on the attack and lost the plot. The English bowling was too good for them and they lost by an innings. So in this series they lost all the three matches by over an innings, they conceded 500+ runs three times.
As far as Australia are concerned there were no positives from this series. It thoroughly exposed their bowling limitations. It also exposed the lack in depth of their batting pipeline and therefore it looks like a very steep climb from here on. Barring Perth, their bowlers never took 20 wickets in a test match. All the commentators were in unison on this. As Ian Chapell said a band aid solution ain’t going to fix it. They need a complete overhaul of the selection committee, the coaching staff and the team. The irony will be if they win the series at home against SL in August they will start day dreaming again. Ricky Ponting is done as a skipper, it remains to be seen if he stays as a batsman.
England on the other hand have a bagful of positives. The batting of Cook, Strauss, Trott, Pietersen, Prior and Bell. The bowling of Anderson, Swann, Finn, Tremlett and Bresnan and the fielding overall has been stellar. The only negative, if you really have to pick any, would be the form of Collingwood (who has announced his retirement now) and to an extent the inability of Pietersen to focus on the job and play a long innings consistently. I thought a lot of credit must go to their coach and the back room team. Their bowlers were spot on from the first delivery and bowled very few no balls. They created opportunities and applied pressure when required.
On the whole, I think England deservedly won the series 3-1. My prediction was a English with a margin of 1 (2-1 being my favored score line). But hey, who is complaining when you witness some great cricket and a total annihilation of the Aussies. Watch out for my statistical analysis of the series to wrap this series.
Thursday, December 30, 2010
The Ashes 2010 – Test 3 and 4: Contrasting Wins
I was on my way back from SF and stuck at Heathrow airport when the third Ashes test was being played at Perth. So I watched most of that test match in the lounge at Heathrow and did not get a chance to write about it. Now that I know the result of the Boxing Day test match, it seems like the Perth test was an aberration. England got into a very good position on Day 1 to have the Aussies reeling at 69/5 but then they let the advantage slip away. They let the Aussies go beyond 200 and then collapsed in their first essay, conceding a lead of over 90 runs. The Australians then went for the kill and won the test match very convincingly. Mitch Johnson was the hero and it seemed like he had found his rhythm. That result raised the hopes for an engaging battle at Melbourne.
The Aussies arrived at Melbourne with their confidence high and then on the opening day England bowled them out for a paltry 98 runs. From that point onwards, only one team could have won that test match and that team was England. They batted superbly, bowled superbly and used the conditions to their advantage. What looked like a very easy batting wicket on day 2 and 3, turned into a field of landmines when the Aussies came out for their second innings. Tremlett, Bresnan, Anderson and Swan bowled beautifully and England won the match by an innings and 157 runs.
Here is my analysis of the events so far:
The Aussies arrived at Melbourne with their confidence high and then on the opening day England bowled them out for a paltry 98 runs. From that point onwards, only one team could have won that test match and that team was England. They batted superbly, bowled superbly and used the conditions to their advantage. What looked like a very easy batting wicket on day 2 and 3, turned into a field of landmines when the Aussies came out for their second innings. Tremlett, Bresnan, Anderson and Swan bowled beautifully and England won the match by an innings and 157 runs.
Here is my analysis of the events so far:
- England came prepared for this series and they had plans for every situation. They in fact had plan B and C and D in most cases. Their bowlers bowled a perfect line and to a plan, their fielding was flawless and batting in full bloom. In my mind, the credit is due to Andy Flower who has worked wonders with this team
- Australians were too confident and never thought that they could be defeated in their own backyard. I would say Ricky Ponting should take a large part of the responsibility for that mind set. They were not prepared, their planning was pathetic and their bowlers had no clue when confronted with quality techinique.
- Two run outs (or possible run outs) in the Melbourne test outline the preparations. First there was a run out appeal against Trott when he was on 50 something. He dived full length and put his bat down in time to cover the ground. He was adjudged ‘not out’. He later said that he had practiced diving in the nets for exactly this type of a situation. Philip Hughes was run out in the second innings and he did not dive. He plonked his bat in and was caught short. That difference in attitude and preparation is what separated the two sides.
- Strauss as a captain also impressed me. He changed the bowlers and the field placements and every time he did that, there was a plan to make it count. It seems like he had studied his opposition very well.
- Finally, I am not a big fan of Ricky Ponting and he once again showed that under pressure he is very ugly. He is on the verge of losing his job as a captain. Australians were always very fierce competitors but the earlier captains like Border, Waugh, Taylor were graceful in accepting the defeat. I think Ponting has taken that aggressive behavior over the precipice and has inculcated a spirit of street brawls in the team. This is not good for Australia and they need to quickly amend this.
Monday, December 13, 2010
The Ashes 2010 – Test 2: England on a song
England played a copybook test match at Adelaide and surged ahead in the Ashes series, for what according to me is a winning lead. They did nothing wrong and everything went wrong for the Aussies. I am going to keep this post very brief since this is way too late after the result, but it is a milestone event in Australian cricket history in my mind. I think the recovery from the current drop in their rating is going to be long and hard. They need a Bob Simpson or a Alan Border to drag them out of this. Ponting or Clarke cannot do that job.
In the first innings, they got Australians all out by the end of day one. During that brief period, the Australians lost 2 wickets in two balls twice. Ricky Ponting continued his dismal form with the bat and with the captaincy in this test too. Only Mike Hussey and Haddin provided some resistance, but England bowlers were up to the task and I think Strauss’s bowling changes were spot on. The English reply was a mammoth 620/5 decl. After Strauss and Cook, this was Pietersen’s turn to come to the party. He scored a magnificent double century and more importantly got the confidence and the swagger back, That only means bad news for the Aussies. Cook and Collingwood also chipped in and on the current form I don’t know how the Australian attack can claim the 20 wickets required to win a test match.
With a lead of 375 runs and one thought the Australians would show true grit that they are known for and save the game. But it was a repeat of the first innings and in the end England won very convincingly by an innings and 71 runs.
As one looks back, the Australian batting, bowling and fielding has been in atrocious. The fact that they dropped some easy catches and missed run outs, indicates their state of confidence. There has been some chopping and churning in their squad before the Perth test, but I do not expect any difference in the result. If they do well, they may just reduce the margin of their loss.
In the first innings, they got Australians all out by the end of day one. During that brief period, the Australians lost 2 wickets in two balls twice. Ricky Ponting continued his dismal form with the bat and with the captaincy in this test too. Only Mike Hussey and Haddin provided some resistance, but England bowlers were up to the task and I think Strauss’s bowling changes were spot on. The English reply was a mammoth 620/5 decl. After Strauss and Cook, this was Pietersen’s turn to come to the party. He scored a magnificent double century and more importantly got the confidence and the swagger back, That only means bad news for the Aussies. Cook and Collingwood also chipped in and on the current form I don’t know how the Australian attack can claim the 20 wickets required to win a test match.
With a lead of 375 runs and one thought the Australians would show true grit that they are known for and save the game. But it was a repeat of the first innings and in the end England won very convincingly by an innings and 71 runs.
As one looks back, the Australian batting, bowling and fielding has been in atrocious. The fact that they dropped some easy catches and missed run outs, indicates their state of confidence. There has been some chopping and churning in their squad before the Perth test, but I do not expect any difference in the result. If they do well, they may just reduce the margin of their loss.
The Ashes 2010 : On the lighter side
I happened to be passing through London Heathrow when the Aussies were getting butchered at Adelaide. You got to hand it to the British press and their sense of humour. The articles they write even when the home team is not doing well are quite humorous and tongue in cheek. I read one such article in The Mail and the author took jibes at Simon Katich getting a duck. So he went on to describe the various types of ducks in cricket. According to him a batsman gets a Golden Duck when he gets out on the first ball that he faces. That is a well known term.
What Katich got was a Platinum duck according to him, because he was at the non striker’s end and was run out without facing a ball. Then the author stretched his imagination and said that the highest honour as far as the anniversaries are concerned is the Granite Anniversary, which is celebrated after 90 years. So what would be a Granite duck?
Well, here it goes. The umpire calls the start of the innings and the two openers start walking out of the dressing room. As they take the stairs to walk down, one of the batsmen drops his pants and they get entangled in his shoes. As a result of this, he starts tumbling down and injures his leg. As he reaches the bottom of the stairs, the masonry work from the roof falls on his head and he has to be rushed to the hospital for treatment. The umpires in the mean time declare him timed out. That my friends is a Granite Duck, because the player did not even come on the field. Great isn’t it?
Of all the folks who have got out under such silly circumstances, I can only think of Inzy to be a good candidate for a Granite Duck.
What Katich got was a Platinum duck according to him, because he was at the non striker’s end and was run out without facing a ball. Then the author stretched his imagination and said that the highest honour as far as the anniversaries are concerned is the Granite Anniversary, which is celebrated after 90 years. So what would be a Granite duck?
Well, here it goes. The umpire calls the start of the innings and the two openers start walking out of the dressing room. As they take the stairs to walk down, one of the batsmen drops his pants and they get entangled in his shoes. As a result of this, he starts tumbling down and injures his leg. As he reaches the bottom of the stairs, the masonry work from the roof falls on his head and he has to be rushed to the hospital for treatment. The umpires in the mean time declare him timed out. That my friends is a Granite Duck, because the player did not even come on the field. Great isn’t it?
Of all the folks who have got out under such silly circumstances, I can only think of Inzy to be a good candidate for a Granite Duck.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)